(Originally written June 29, 2015)
I read online a remark that finally put me over the edge. In reaction to nine people gunned down at a prayer meeting and Bible study, many have called for removal of the Confederate battle flag. Without getting into all the First Amendment issues, I want to be clear: I believe the time has long since passed for that symbol to removed from official government locations. Fly it in your front yard or hang it on your pick-up truck, but don't try to make it an official symbol of American freedom, because it's not.
For those who want to get hyper-technical and argue this banner was never the official flag of the Confederate States of America, but only a flag carried into battle by some troops, my response is "horse-hockey." Anyone who has paid attention for the last 150 years knows the primary symbol of the old south is that emblem. Otherwise, if it were only some one-off standard from a single regiment, it would not have the impact it does.
For those who say it is only a symbol of southern pride and heritage, my guess is you do not have dark skin or ancestors carried over to this country on a slave ship. Your family was never sold or held in chains unjustly or split apart by a human master who decreed it. That flag may be a symbol of southern pride to you, but try walking in someone else's shoes for only a couple of minutes. For people who are the heirs of that legacy of slavery, the flag represents pain, humiliation, and shame.
There can be no pride in slavery because there is no dignity accorded to a human being trapped in that horrid state. Why on earth would you want to deliberately inflict more pain on people with that collective memory?Why insist they be subjected to it by their government?
For those who want to argue about the American Civil War, its purpose, and what percentage of people owned slaves before and during that war, my response is to check your facts. My great-great-grandfather fought and was wounded in the war on the Confederate side. I visited his grave last October and saw the Confederate flag ensconced on the grave marker. I have no quarrel with that, because that is history. And even though my family may not have owned slaves (but I cannot be certain), according to official census records from 1860, 28% of the families in Texas did own slaves. (In Mississippi it was 49%. ) Until recently I sincerely believed that my family never owned any slaves because they were so darned poor. My research into our genealogy has caused me to reconsider that life-long belief, because it is a serious possibility. There are legal records in Alabama indicating bequests that include slaves in wills, so if I am looking at the right person -- yet to be confirmed because the name is not uncommon, but good possibility -- then the evidence leans in the direction of slave ownership.
The Sons of Confederate Veterans and other apologists want to insist the American Civil War was not about slavery. Technically, they are correct -- at least insofar as why the war got started. The reason the war began was the "united" portion of United States was ripped asunder. Abraham Lincoln was very clear that his motivation was to save the Union.
However, the specter of slavery was very much in the picture from the beginning. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 that created the Mason-Dixon line, established the boundaries beyond which slavery could not extend. The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 completely stripped the carefully worked-out provisions from 1820, essentially repealing the compromise. It opened Kansas and Nebraska to slavery and provided that future territories would vote (that is, free, white male property owners could vote) whether slavery should be permitted in newly-opened territories.
So for those who want to argue that "War of Northern Aggression" was about states' rights, be careful. That position is true only if one understands the "states' right" at issue was slavery. Slavery was the economic backbone of the old south. The greatest concentration of wealth in the mid-19th century was in the hands of southern plantation owners. The largest portion of that wealth was the commercial value (at that time) of the slaves, not the land or what we would think of as capital equipment (e.g. horses, mules, plows). If the plantation owners were forced to pay wages to produces their goods, the system would have been so much less profitable, it likely would have collapsed.
Moreover, consider this quote from the "Declaration of Causes which Impel the State of Texas to Secede from the Federal Union": "We hold as undeniable truths that the governments of the various States, and of the confederacy itself, were established exclusively by the white race, for themselves and their posterity; that the African race had no agency in their establishment; that they were rightfully held and regarded as an inferior and dependent race, and in that condition only could their existence in this country be rendered beneficial or tolerable." Reading the entire document compels but one conclusion: Texas seceded from the United States in 1861 because of slavery.
For those who would gloss over the impact of the American Civil War, consider this. Approximately 620,000 soldiers died in that war (a recent study put the number of deaths as high as 850,000). That is almost half (49%) of all American soldiers killed in
all of the wars ever fought by the United States, including World Wars I and II, Korea, Vietnam, the Gulf War -- and the American Revolution -- around 644,000. Over 3 million soldiers fought on both sides in the American Civil War, many of whom were brothers that fought opposite each other. There is nothing romantic or nostalgic about this war. Over 1 million Americans either died or were wounded in this tragedy.
If we are to remember this episode in our history -- and we should -- let it be for the right reasons. I recognize that people fought to preserve their way of life and because they felt a sense of duty. But let's not lose sight of the bitter truths about this war. Ultimately, it was about slavery and that way of life is gone and should stay gone.
So for the people who claim anyone in favor of removing Confederate battle flags from official state images should "sit down and shut up," I say, "Hell, no." We can have a civil discourse whether streets named for those old leaders should be changed; civil discourse is part of our American way of doing things.
Or at least it should be. Removal of archaic, racist memorabilia? From your home, maybe not. From the state house, you bet.